Donald Trump has turned to the US Supreme Court to defend his tariff measures. He wants the justices to overturn a ruling that declared his wide-ranging duties illegal.
Power struggle with Congress
The administration filed its petition on Wednesday night. It urges the court to decide quickly if a president can impose tariffs without congressional approval. Last week, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 7-4 against Trump. The judges said the power to set tariffs rests solely with Congress.
Threat to economic agenda
The case could derail Trump’s trade and foreign policy strategy. It might also force the government to repay billions in tariff revenues. Trump justified his actions under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. The law permits presidential steps against “unusual and extraordinary” threats. In April, he declared an economic emergency, claiming trade imbalances damaged US industry and endangered security.
Enforcement paused for appeal
Despite ruling against Trump, the appeals court delayed the decision’s effect. That gave the administration time to appeal. “The stakes in this case could not be higher,” Solicitor General John Sauer wrote in Wednesday’s filing. He said the ruling disrupted sensitive trade talks and created legal uncertainty. He warned it weakened efforts to prevent an economic and foreign policy crisis.
Small businesses in the fight
The lawsuits were filed by small firms that say the tariffs threaten their survival. Their lawyers remain confident. “These unlawful tariffs are hurting small businesses,” said Jeffrey Schwab of the Liberty Justice Center. “We hope for a fast resolution for our clients.” If the Supreme Court refuses to hear the case, the ruling takes effect on October 14.
Previous legal setbacks
In May, the Court of International Trade in New York also ruled the tariffs unlawful. That decision was suspended during the appeals process. The lawsuits came from small companies and a coalition of states. In April, Trump signed executive orders introducing a 10 percent base tariff and “reciprocal” tariffs on more than 90 countries.
Global consequences
The appeals court also blocked tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China. Trump argued they were necessary to combat drug imports. Other duties, such as those on steel and aluminum, remain in effect. They rely on a separate presidential authority.
